๐Ÿ“‹ Case Study

Iron Ore Mine Sensor Fusion for Banded Iron Formation (BIF) Delineation

Conventional geophysics failed to resolve thin hematite bands (<2m) within jaspilite, causing 22% grade variance in ROM feed

๐Ÿ—๏ธ Project Overview

Pilbara open pit, Australia

๐ŸŽฏ Challenge

Conventional geophysics failed to resolve thin hematite bands (<2m) within jaspilite, causing 22% grade variance in ROM feed

๐Ÿ”ง Design Approach

Multi-scale fusion: airborne magnetics (200m), ground EM (10m), and drill-core hyperspectral (0.5m); ensemble U-Net segmentation trained on 12,000 core images

๐Ÿ“ Design Diagram

Iron Ore Mine Sensor Fusion for BIF Delineation Conventional geophysics failed โ†’ 22% grade variance in ROM feed AM 200m res EM 10m res HS 0.5m res Multi-Scale Fusion Engine U-Net Ensemble (12k images) Band Detection Precision: 94.1% TP/(TP+FP) Feed Grade Std Dev Reduction 1.42% โ†’ 0.67% Fe

AI-generated project design illustration

๐Ÿ“ Key Calculations

Band Detection Precision

TP/(TP+FP)
Result: 94.1%
Critical for ROM blending accuracy

Feed Grade Std Dev Reduction

ฯƒโ‚šแตฃโ‚‘ โˆ’ ฯƒโ‚šโ‚’โ‚›โ‚œ
Result: 1.42% โ†’ 0.67% Fe
Reduces downstream processing variability

๐Ÿ“Š Results

ROM feed grade variance halved, crusher throughput increased 7.2% via optimized blend sequencing, $14.2M annual savings in penalty payments

๐Ÿ’ก Lessons Learned

  • โ€ขCore image labeling required stratigraphic expert consensus
  • โ€ขAirborne-to-ground resolution gap bridged via generative adversarial upscaling
  • โ€ขModel versioning tied to blast round numbers for traceability

โœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Core image labeling required stratigraphic expert consensus
  • 2Airborne-to-ground resolution gap bridged via generative adversarial upscaling
  • 3Model versioning tied to blast round numbers for traceability