AI Grade Control Validation Report Template (JORC/NI 43-101 Compliant)
The AI Grade Control Validation Report Template is a standardized, auditable documentation framework designed to validate the performance, reliability, and regulatory compliance of artificial intelligence models used in orebody delineation and grade control. It ensures transparency, reproducibility, and technical rigor required under JORC Code (2012) and NI 43-101 reporting standards. The template bridges geostatistical validation practices with AI/ML model evaluation protocols, enabling qualified persons (QPs) to assess whether AI-derived grade estimates meet statutory disclosure requirements for public reporting.
📖 Overview
📑 Key Components
🎯 Applications
- ✓ Supporting JORC/NI 43-101-compliant mineral resource statements
- ✓ Enabling internal QA/QC for AI-driven stope design and blast hole sampling
- ✓ Facilitating third-party technical review and regulatory audit readiness
📐 Key Formulas
Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)
RMSE = √(1/n × Σᵢ₌₁ⁿ (yᵢ − ŷᵢ)²)
Quantifies average magnitude of prediction errors between AI-estimated grades (ŷᵢ) and validation assay values (yᵢ); used to assess numerical accuracy.
Spatial Bias Index (SBI)
SBI = (Σᵢ wᵢ × (yᵢ − ŷᵢ)) / Σᵢ wᵢ
Measures systematic over- or under-prediction across geological domains using inverse-distance weighting (wᵢ); detects domain-specific model bias relevant to JORC Section 22.2c (geological interpretation).
Grade Reconciliation Ratio (GRR)
GRR = (Actual Mined Grade) / (AI-Predicted Block Grade)
Evaluates operational fidelity by comparing AI-grade predictions against actual mill feed or stockpile assay results; key for NI 43-101 Section 4.2 (reasonable prospects for economic extraction).