📋 Case Study

Mine Planning & Scheduling Case Study 1

Industrial application

🏗️ Project Overview

Open-pit copper mine in northern Chile; 120 Mt annual throughput; 25-year mine life; complex geology with variable ore grades and multiple waste rock types.

🎯 Challenge

Inconsistent production scheduling due to inaccurate grade estimation and inflexible short-term plans, leading to 18% monthly ore grade variance, stockpile bottlenecks, and mill underutilization (average 68% capacity utilization).

🔧 Design Approach

Integrated stochastic block model + mixed-integer programming (MIP) optimization for long-term (5-year) and short-term (monthly) scheduling; incorporated geological uncertainty via conditional simulation, dynamic stockpile management constraints, and real-time grade reconciliation feedback loops.

📐 Design Diagram

Challenges• 18% grade variance• Stockpile bottlenecks• Mill @ 68% utilizationDesign Approach• Stochastic block model• MIP scheduling (5-yr + monthly)• Real-time grade feedbackMIPCOGHminMPFICOG = 0.32% CuHmin = 8.4 mMPFI = 0.87Integrated WorkflowGeological UncertaintyGrade ReconciliationDynamic StockpileMill & Stockpile Output

AI-generated project design illustration

📐 Key Calculations

Optimal Cut-off Grade

COG = (P × G × (1 − R) − C) / (P × (1 − R))
Result: 0.32% Cu
Balanced net present value maximization against processing capacity and recovery losses; reduced low-grade ore dilution by 22%.

Minimum Practical Bench Height for Selective Mining

H_min = (2 × σ_y × tan(φ)) / (γ × FS)
Result: 8.4 m
Ensured geotechnical stability while enabling selective extraction of high-grade zones; decreased dilution from 19% to 11%.

Monthly Production Flexibility Index (MPFI)

MPFI = 1 − (σ_grade / μ_grade)
Result: 0.87
Quantified schedule robustness; increase from 0.62 to 0.87 confirmed improved grade predictability and operational responsiveness.

📊 Results

Metrics: Grade variance reduced from 18% to 5.3%, Mill utilization increased to 92%, NPV uplift: USD 1.4B over life-of-mine, Schedule adherence improved from 71% to 94%
The integrated planning framework enabled adaptive, grade-driven scheduling, eliminated chronic stockpile congestion, and delivered consistent mill feed quality—resulting in sustained productivity gains and significant economic value creation.

💡 Lessons Learned

  • Geological uncertainty must be explicitly modeled—not averaged—in scheduling inputs
  • Real-time grade reconciliation requires seamless integration between mine control, survey, and lab systems
  • Stakeholder alignment across geology, mining, and processing is critical for constraint validation in MIP models

Key Takeaways

  • 1Robust mine scheduling requires coupling stochastic resource modeling with deterministic operational optimization—and continuous feedback calibration