📋 Case Study
Mine Planning & Scheduling Case Study 2
Commercial application
🏗️ Project Overview
Open-pit copper mine in northern Chile; 120 Mt/y throughput capacity; 25-year life-of-mine; operated by a multinational mining company with integrated processing and rail logistics.
🎯 Challenge
Inconsistent haul truck utilization due to static, annual mine plans that failed to account for real-time geotechnical variability, equipment downtime, and fluctuating ore grade targets—resulting in 18% schedule slippage and $24M/year in underutilized fleet costs.
🔧 Design Approach
Adopted a dynamic, stochastic short-term scheduling framework integrating geostatistical ore body modeling, discrete-event simulation of haul cycle times, and mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimization updated weekly using live GPS fleet telemetry and blast fragmentation data.
📐 Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
📐 Key Calculations
Optimal Haul Cycle Time Adjustment Factor
T_cycle_adj = T_base × (1 + 0.003 × ΔSlope% + 0.012 × Moisture_content_% - 0.008 × RQD)
Result: 1.14 (unitless)
Corrects nominal cycle time for site-specific haul road conditions and rock mass quality, improving truck dispatch accuracy by 22%.
Stochastic Ore Grade Variance Penalty Weight
λ_grade = σ²_grade / (Target_grade² × Annual_production_t)
Result: 0.0072 t⁻¹
Quantifies risk cost of grade deviation per tonne, enabling MILP to prioritize selective mining blocks that balance recovery and schedule adherence.
Fleet Utilization Efficiency Index
UEI = (Actual_ore_hauled_t / (Fleet_capacity_t × Operating_hours)) × 100%
Result: 86.3%
Benchmarked against industry best practice (≥85%), confirming feasibility of proposed dispatch logic before implementation.
📊 Results
Metrics: Schedule adherence improved from 71% to 94%, Truck utilization increased from 62% to 86%, Ore grade variance reduced by 31% relative to target, NPV uplift: $112M over LOM
Implementation of the dynamic planning-scheduling loop reduced schedule slippage to <3%, increased net smelter return per tonne by 4.7%, and enabled real-time re-optimization during unplanned pit wall instability events without production loss.
💡 Lessons Learned
- •Integration of real-time geotechnical data into scheduling requires standardized API interfaces between survey, geotech, and fleet management systems.
- •Stochastic optimization gains are negated without cross-functional operational discipline—scheduler training and KPI alignment across mining, maintenance, and geology teams were critical success factors.
✅ Key Takeaways
- 1Dynamic, data-driven mine scheduling is not just a software upgrade—it demands concurrent process redesign, governance protocols, and performance-linked accountability across technical functions.