π Case Study
South African Platinum Group Metals Stockpile Optimization
Overstocking of lower-grade material due to inflexible blending schedules and forecast errors
ποΈ Project Overview
UG2 reef mine with volatile metal prices and multi-product blending
π― Challenge
Overstocking of lower-grade material due to inflexible blending schedules and forecast errors
π§ Design Approach
Stochastic inventory model with price-driven dynamic blending windows and real-time assay feedback loop
π Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
π Key Calculations
Optimal Stockpile Mix Ratio
Max Ξ£(P_i Γ Grade_i) β Cost
Result: 62:38 UG2:Merensky blend
Maximized net smelter return per ton
Inventory Holding Cost Reduction
Holding_Cost Γ Avg_Inventory
Result: $4.1M/year saved
Freed working capital for exploration drilling
π Results
Blending accuracy improved from Β±8.2% to Β±1.4%; stockpile turnover accelerated by 4.3x; 12-month forward price exposure hedged at 92% confidenceπ‘ Lessons Learned
- β’Assay latency must be <90 mins for effective closed-loop control
- β’Blending optimization requires grade correlation matrixβnot just averages
β Key Takeaways
- 1Assay latency must be <90 mins for effective closed-loop control
- 2Blending optimization requires grade correlation matrixβnot just averages