πŸ“‹ Case Study

South African Platinum Group Metals Stockpile Optimization

Overstocking of lower-grade material due to inflexible blending schedules and forecast errors

πŸ—οΈ Project Overview

UG2 reef mine with volatile metal prices and multi-product blending

🎯 Challenge

Overstocking of lower-grade material due to inflexible blending schedules and forecast errors

πŸ”§ Design Approach

Stochastic inventory model with price-driven dynamic blending windows and real-time assay feedback loop

πŸ“ Design Diagram

South African PGM Stockpile Optimization Overstocking of lower-grade material (inf. blending + forecast error) Stochastic Inventory Model Price-Driven Dynamic Blending Windows Real-Time Assay Feedback Loop Optimal Blend: 62:38 UG2:Merensky $4.1M/yr saved Challenge Zone Optimization Core

AI-generated project design illustration

πŸ“ Key Calculations

Optimal Stockpile Mix Ratio

Max Ξ£(P_i Γ— Grade_i) βˆ’ Cost
Result: 62:38 UG2:Merensky blend
Maximized net smelter return per ton

Inventory Holding Cost Reduction

Holding_Cost Γ— Avg_Inventory
Result: $4.1M/year saved
Freed working capital for exploration drilling

πŸ“Š Results

Blending accuracy improved from Β±8.2% to Β±1.4%; stockpile turnover accelerated by 4.3x; 12-month forward price exposure hedged at 92% confidence

πŸ’‘ Lessons Learned

  • β€’Assay latency must be <90 mins for effective closed-loop control
  • β€’Blending optimization requires grade correlation matrixβ€”not just averages

βœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Assay latency must be <90 mins for effective closed-loop control
  • 2Blending optimization requires grade correlation matrixβ€”not just averages